TensorZero vs Langfuse
Side-by-side comparison from the Agent Observability Index: licensing, self-hosting, pricing model and integrations — no vendor copy, primary sources linked.
| TensorZero | Langfuse | |
|---|---|---|
| One-liner | Open-source LLMOps stack unifying gateway, observability, evaluations, optimization and experimentation. | Open-source (MIT) LLM engineering platform combining tracing, prompt management, evals and datasets, widely used as the default self-hosted observability stack. |
| Category | Observability & Tracing | Observability & Tracing |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing model | free | freemium |
| Pricing notes | Fully open source (Rust gateway + ClickHouse storage) | Free Hobby tier (50k units/mo); Core $29/mo, Pro $199/mo, unlimited users on paid tiers; MIT core fully self-hostable |
| Frameworks | OpenAI SDK, Anthropic, vLLM | langchain, openai-sdk, llamaindex, litellm, opentelemetry, vercel-ai, haystack |
| Funding / ownership | $7.3M seed (2025) | YC W23; $4M seed (Lightspeed, La Famiglia) |
How to choose
- Both link to primary pricing sources below — verify current tiers before committing; this market shifts monthly.
Sources: TensorZero · Langfuse